rs145936354

Variant names:

• chr2-214767467-C-A
• rs145936354
• NM_000465.4:c.1568+15G>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr2-214767467-C-A
• chr2-214767467-C-G
• chr2-214767467-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.1568+15G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000124 in 1,610,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: BARD1 NM_000465.4 intron
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.195

Genes affected

BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
• BP6: Variant 2-214767467-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214767467-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 140771.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BARD1	NM_000465.4	c.1568+15G>T		intron_variant	Intron 6 of 10	ENST00000260947.9	NP_000456.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BARD1	ENST00000260947.9	c.1568+15G>T		intron_variant	Intron 6 of 10	1	NM_000465.4	ENSP00000260947.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16 AN: 152154 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000241

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000220

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000638 AC: 16 AN: 250856 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000738 AC XY: 10 AN XY: 135586

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000124

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000126 AC: 183 AN: 1457848 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000112 AC XY: 81 AN XY: 725522

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000152

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000216

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16 AN: 152154 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3 AN XY: 74324

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000220

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.0000434 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000945

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 29, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2

Oct 30, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 08, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BARD1 c.1568+15G>T variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the MutDB, Clinvitae or Zhejiang University Databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs145936354) as “With Likely benign allele” and ClinVar (2x as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Color Genomics). This variant was identified in our laboratory in one breast cancer patient co-occurring with a pathogenic CHEK2 variant (c.684-?_846+?del), increasing the likelihood that the c.1568+15G>T variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 17 of 276586 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.000125) and European Non-Finnish in 14 of 126260 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it was not observed in the “Other”, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; however, this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.87
CADD	Benign	0.67
DANN	Benign	0.79

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145936354; hg19: chr2-215632191;