chr2-214809509-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.61C>T(p.Arg21Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000069 in 1,448,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000465.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.90e-7 AC: 1AN: 1448658Hom.: 0 Cov.: 74 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 720054
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 25, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 15, 2021 | The p.R21C variant (also known as c.61C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the BARD1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 61. The arginine at codon 21 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 04, 2017 | This variant is denoted BARD1 c.61C>T at the cDNA level, p.Arg21Cys (R21C) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Cysteine (CGT>TGT). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as a germline variant; however, it has been reported in a lung tumor (Imielinski 2012). BARD1 Arg21Cys was not observed in large population cohorts (NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, The 1000 Genomes Consortium 2015, Lek 2016). Since Arginine and Cysteine differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. BARD1 Arg21Cys occurs at a position that is not conserved and is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses predict that this variant is unlikely to alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether BARD1 Arg21Cys is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 06, 2024 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 21 of the BARD1 protein (p.Arg21Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BARD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 230082). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The cysteine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at