chr3-30671828-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.645C>G(p.His215Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003242.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR2 | ENST00000295754.10 | c.645C>G | p.His215Gln | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 7 | 1 | NM_003242.6 | ENSP00000295754.5 | ||
TGFBR2 | ENST00000359013.4 | c.720C>G | p.His240Gln | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 8 | 1 | ENSP00000351905.4 | |||
TGFBR2 | ENST00000672866.1 | n.2241C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251078Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135702
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces histidine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 215 of the TGFBR2 protein (p.His215Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs758827786, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TGFBR2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 543889). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TGFBR2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
The p.H215Q variant (also known as c.645C>G), located in coding exon 4 of the TGFBR2 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 645. The histidine at codon 215 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
This missense variant replaces histidine with glutamine at codon 215 of the TGFBR2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with TGFBR2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/251078 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at