chr5-1253756-G-A

Position:

• chr5-1253756-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2 BP4_Moderate

The NM_198253.3(TERT):​c.3371C>T​(p.Pro1124Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1124P) has been classified as Likely benign.

• Frequency: Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
• Consequence: TERT NM_198253.3 missense
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.155

Genes affected

TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07636455).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TERT	NM_198253.3	c.3371C>T	p.Pro1124Leu	missense_variant	16/16	ENST00000310581.10
TERT	NM_001193376.3	c.3182C>T	p.Pro1061Leu	missense_variant	15/15
TERT	NR_149162.3	n.3079C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	13/13
TERT	NR_149163.3	n.3043C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	13/13

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TERT	ENST00000310581.10	c.3371C>T	p.Pro1124Leu	missense_variant	16/16	1	NM_198253.3	P2
	ENST00000666708.1	n.289-918G>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33

GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Mar 13, 2021

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TERT protein function. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with TERT-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces proline with leucine at codon 1124 of the TERT protein (p.Pro1124Leu). The proline residue is weakly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and leucine. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.093
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.023	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.27
CADD	Benign	2.5
DANN	Benign	0.43
DEOGEN2	Uncertain	0.50	T;.
Eigen	Benign	-1.0
Eigen_PC	Benign	-1.1
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.023	N
LIST_S2	Benign	0.80	T;T
M_CAP	Uncertain	0.15	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.076	T;T
MetaSVM	Uncertain	-0.13	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	0.26	N;.
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	N;N;N
PrimateAI	Benign	0.35	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-1.9	N;N
REVEL	Benign	0.12
Sift	Benign	0.14	T;T
Sift4G	Benign	0.065	T;T
Polyphen		0.053	B;B
Vest4		0.077
MutPred		0.29		Loss of disorder (P = 0.0143);.;
MVP		0.36
MPC		1.1
ClinPred		0.017	T
GERP RS		0.14
Varity_R		0.051
gMVP		0.46

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

No publications associated with this variant yet.

Other links and lift over

hg19: chr5-1253871;