rs111671429
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000138.5(FBN1):c.510C>T(p.Tyr170=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000914 in 1,613,972 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00076 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
FBN1
NM_000138.5 synonymous
NM_000138.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.00400
Genes affected
FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
?
Variant 15-48596311-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48596311-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36086.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Likely_benign=14, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr15-48596311-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr15-48596311-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.004 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000762 (116/152288) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00135 (92/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00113. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 54 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 116 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN1 | NM_000138.5 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant | 6/66 | ENST00000316623.10 | |
FBN1 | NM_001406716.1 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant | 5/65 | ||
FBN1 | NM_001406717.1 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant | 6/9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN1 | ENST00000316623.10 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant | 6/66 | 1 | NM_000138.5 | P1 | |
FBN1 | ENST00000559133.6 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 6/67 | 1 | |||
FBN1 | ENST00000674301.2 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 6/68 | ||||
FBN1 | ENST00000537463.6 | c.510C>T | p.Tyr170= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 6/31 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000762 AC: 116AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
116
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000589 AC: 148AN: 251382Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000574 AC XY: 78AN XY: 135858
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
148
AN:
251382
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
135858
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000930 AC: 1359AN: 1461684Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000926 AC XY: 673AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1359
AN:
1461684
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
673
AN XY:
727150
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000762 AC: 116AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000725 AC XY: 54AN XY: 74462
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
116
AN:
152288
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
74462
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 05, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | FBN1: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 07, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 12, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 18, 2017 | p.Tyr170Tyr in exon 5 of FBN1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.1% (143/126624) o f European chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, by the Genome Aggregation Databa se (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs111671429). - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 21, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 16, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 10, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Marfan syndrome Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 19, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Stiff skin syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Weill-Marchesani syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Geleophysic dysplasia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Acromicric dysplasia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at