rs113849804

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 1P and 10B. PP2BP4BP6BS1BS2

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):​c.1433G>A​(p.Arg478His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000354 in 1,614,098 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 missense

Scores

10
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.94
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), BMPR1A. . Gene score misZ 1.9176 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.8989 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2, generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli, hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome, pulmonary arterial hypertension, juvenile polyposis syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.3115873).
BP6
Variant 10-86923466-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86923466-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41780.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=7, not_provided=1, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000237 (36/152204) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000456 (31/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000329. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 36 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BMPR1ANM_004329.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1433G>A p.Arg478His missense_variant 12/13 ENST00000372037.8 NP_004320.2 P36894

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BMPR1AENST00000372037.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1433G>A p.Arg478His missense_variant 12/131 NM_004329.3 ENSP00000361107.2 P36894

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152204
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000456
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000171
AC:
43
AN:
251494
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000177
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000367
AC:
536
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000352
AC XY:
256
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000437
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000613
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152204
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000456
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000162
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000280
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000140
AC:
17
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 24, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 21, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed individuals with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or other Lynch syndrome-associated tumor (Tung et al., 2015; Yurgelun et al., 2015; DeRycke et al., 2017; Pearlman et al., 2017; Yurgelun et al., 2017; MacFarland et al., 2021); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22703879, 28135145, 30374176, 33097490, 25186627, 25980754, 28944238, 27978560, 32522605, 33032550, 25996639, 28873162, 25801821, 30814609) -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant interpretted as Uncertain significance and reported on 06-21-2018 by Lab or GTR ID 26957. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicAug 17, 2023BS1 -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 28, 2016The p.Arg478His variant in BMPR1A has been reported in 1 individual with suspect ed Lynch Syndrome (Yurgelun 2015), 2 individuals who underwent exome sequencing for non-cancer related indications (Johnston 2012, D'Alessandro 2016) and has al so been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 41780). This variant has also been ide ntified in 15/66738 of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs113849804). Computational predict ion tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Arg478His variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule ou t pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Arg478His varian t is uncertain. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 28, 2024Variant summary: BMPR1A c.1433G>A (p.Arg478His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Serine-threonine/tyrosine-protein kinase, catalytic domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00017 in 251494 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00029 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 145 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BMPR1A causing Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome phenotype (2e-06). Although c.1433G>A has been reported in the literature within settings of multigene panel testing for hereditary cancers, these report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome (example Yurgelun_2015, Dalessandro_2015, Johnston_2012, Pearlman_2016, Tung_2014, Yurgelun_2017, Tsai_2019). A recent study reporting outcomes of re-classification of VUS from patient-driven family studies reported this variant with no cases of polyposis in a family (Tsai_2019). Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the literature and at our laboratory (examples, Yurgelun_2015, EPCAM deletion of exons 1-9; Our laboratory, BRCA2 c.1813dupA, p.I1605fs*11; Tsai_2019, an unspecified co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the PALB2 gene), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 22703879, 25980754, 25186627, 25996639, 27978560, 28135145, 30374176). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 41780). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 25, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 28, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 25, 2021This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonApr 30, 2018The BMPR1A variant designated as NM_004329.2:c.1433G>A (p.Arg478His) is classified as likely benign. This variant is listed in population databases and is found in approximately 1 out of 1750 individuals of European ancestry. In silico programs predict that this variant is likely to be tolerated (SIFT, Polyphen-2, Align-GVGD). In one observed family, this variant was not shown to segregate with colon polyps in family members who were over 60 years old. Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID:29300386) gives approimately 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to alter BMPR1A function or modify cancer risk. A modest (less than 2 fold) increase in cancer risk due to this variant cannot be entirely excluded. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylApr 05, 2018- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 02, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -
Polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2;C1868081:Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
BMPR1A-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 03, 2024The BMPR1A c.1433G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg478His. This variant has been identified in an individual from a study of participants who were selected for a range of atherosclerosis phenotypes, but not for a personal or family history of cancer (Johnston et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 22703879). Additionally, it was identified in an individual with atrioventricular septum defect who also had learning and psychiatric disabilities and cervical spine anomalies (D'Alessandro et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 25996639). Multiple studies identified this variant in individuals with colorectal cancer and classified it as a variant of uncertain significance (Table S2, Yurgelun et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25980754; eTable 2, Pearlman et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 27978560). This variant is reported in 0.029% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations ranging from benign to uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/41780/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.75
D
Eigen
Benign
0.087
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.23
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.058
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.31
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.34
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.74
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.38
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.056
T
Polyphen
0.15
B
Vest4
0.40
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.72
ClinPred
0.093
T
GERP RS
4.6
Varity_R
0.32
gMVP
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113849804; hg19: chr10-88683223; API