rs113984787
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.301G>A(p.Ala101Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00211 in 1,566,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017636.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00663 AC: 986AN: 148716Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000828 AC: 20AN: 241570Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000844 AC XY: 11AN XY: 130256
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00163 AC: 2312AN: 1417950Hom.: 37 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00187 AC XY: 1316AN XY: 704416
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00663 AC: 987AN: 148828Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00684 AC XY: 497AN XY: 72662
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Variant summary: TRPM4 c.301G>A (p.Ala101Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.3e-05 in 241570 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 33 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TRPM4 causing Progressive Familial Heart Block Type 1B phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.301G>A in individuals affected with Progressive Familial Heart Block Type 1B and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
TRPM4: BP4, BS2 -
- -
Progressive familial heart block type IB Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
TRPM4-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at