rs146079657
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_005660.3(SLC35A2):c.990C>T(p.Leu330Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000867 in 1,208,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 361 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005660.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000651 AC: 73AN: 112132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000788 AC XY: 27AN XY: 34278
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000567 AC: 102AN: 180043Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000695 AC XY: 45AN XY: 64769
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000889 AC: 975AN: 1096862Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000922 AC XY: 334AN XY: 362242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000651 AC: 73AN: 112132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000788 AC XY: 27AN XY: 34278
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
SLC35A2-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at