rs150351852

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_006348.5(COG5):c.298C>T(p.Leu100Phe) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000858 in 1,613,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00093 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00085 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

COG5
NM_006348.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.17

Variant links:

Genes affected

COG5 (HGNC:14857): (component of oligomeric golgi complex 5) The protein encoded by this gene is one of eight proteins (Cog1-8) which form a Golgi-localized complex (COG) required for normal Golgi morphology and function. The encoded protein is organized with conserved oligomeric Golgi complex components 6, 7 and 8 into a sub-complex referred to as lobe B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene result in congenital disorder of glycosylation type 2I.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

COG5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06370422).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000926 (141/152286) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00451 (69/15288). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00366. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 76 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COG5	NM_006348.5 link	c.298C>T	p.Leu100Phe	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 22	ENST00000297135.9	NP_006339.4	Q9UP83

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COG5	ENST00000297135.9 link	c.298C>T	p.Leu100Phe	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 22	1	NM_006348.5	ENSP00000297135.4		Q9UP83

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000927

AC:

141

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00452

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000955

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000843

AC:

212

AN:

251422

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000854

AC XY:

116

AN XY:

135880

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00217

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000851

AC:

1244

AN:

1461342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000845

AC XY:

614

AN XY:

727018

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000329

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00181

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000990

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000729

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000926

AC:

141

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00451

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000955

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00101

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000982

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00189

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000814

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000692

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00104

EpiControl

AF:

0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

COG5-congenital disorder of glycosylation

Uncertain:4Benign:1

Nov 16, 2020

Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: curation

The heterozygous p.Leu131Phe (p.Leu100Phe) variant in COG5 was identified by our study in the compound heterozygous state, along with a likely benign variant, in 1 individual with congenital disorder of glycosylation, type IIi (commonly referred to as COG5-CDG or CDG2I). The variant has not been previously reported in individuals with COG5-CDG and has been identified in 0.21% (76/35438) of Latino chromosomes and 1 homozygote by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP ID: rs150351852). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. The p.Leu131Phe variant is located in a region of COG5 that is essential to protein folding and stability, suggesting that this variant is in a functional domain and slightly supports pathogenicity (PMID: 25331899). In summary, the clinical significance of the variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1, PM1 (Richards 2015). -

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 11, 2019

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Oct 21, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.81

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.13

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.030

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.19

T;.;.;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.89

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.85

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;D;D;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.025

MetaRNN

Benign

0.064

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.59

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.9

M;M;M;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.75

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.3

D;D;D;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.37

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;.

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;.;.

Vest4

0.81

MVP

0.72

MPC

0.37

ClinPred

0.16

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.77

gMVP

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.090

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over