rs1553171141
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 15 ACMG points: 15P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The ENST00000361445.9(MTOR):c.7238G>T(p.Ser2413Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S2413C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000361445.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTOR | NM_004958.4 | c.7238G>T | p.Ser2413Ile | missense_variant | 53/58 | ENST00000361445.9 | NP_004949.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTOR | ENST00000361445.9 | c.7238G>T | p.Ser2413Ile | missense_variant | 53/58 | 1 | NM_004958.4 | ENSP00000354558 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 09, 2016 | - - |
Macrocephaly-intellectual disability-neurodevelopmental disorder-small thorax syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Apr 26, 2023 | - - |
CEBALID syndrome Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Equipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de Bourgogne | Sep 01, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at