rs1799792

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000400.4(ERCC2):c.601C>T(p.His201Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000319 in 1,613,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC2
NM_000400.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.87

Publications

18 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC2 (HGNC:3434): (ERCC excision repair 2, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is a mechanism to repair damage to DNA. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and is an integral member of the basal transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex. The gene product has ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity and belongs to the RAD3/XPD subfamily of helicases. Defects in this gene can result in three different disorders, the cancer-prone syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

ERCC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
trichothiodystrophy 1, photosensitive
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
xeroderma pigmentosum group D
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
sarcoma
Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
COFS syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
trichothiodystrophy
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
xeroderma pigmentosum
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
xeroderma pigmentosum-Cockayne syndrome complex
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ERCC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01468423).

BP6

Variant 19-45364541-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-45364541-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 546846.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000282 (43/152256) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00269 (13/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00159. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 19 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC2	NM_000400.4 link	c.601C>T	p.His201Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 23	ENST00000391945.10	NP_000391.1	P18074-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ERCC2	ENST00000391945.10 link	c.601C>T	p.His201Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 23	1	NM_000400.4	ENSP00000375809.4		P18074-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000279

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000541

AC:

135

AN:

249522

AF XY:

0.000709

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000302

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000986

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000323

AC:

472

AN:

1460882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000424

AC XY:

308

AN XY:

726722

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33460

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00335

AC:

289

AN:

86228

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53056

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00399

AC:

AN:

5258

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000120

AC:

133

AN:

1111990

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000464

AC:

AN:

60338

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

110

146

183

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000282

AC:

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000255

AC XY:

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000392

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00269

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000279

AC:

AN:

68000

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000252

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000174

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000634

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Xeroderma pigmentosum

Benign:1

Apr 28, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

ERCC2-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 06, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.092

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.26

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.15

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.45

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.19

T;T;T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.065

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.11

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.97

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.040

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.84

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.3

L;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

8.9

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.84

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.1

N;N;.;N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.23

Sift

Benign

1.0

T;T;.;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;T;T;T;.

Polyphen

0.0010

B;B;.;.;.

Vest4

0.60

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.15

GERP RS

4.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

Varity_R

0.23

gMVP

0.65

Mutation Taster

=43/57

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over