rs1799792

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The ENST00000391945.10(ERCC2):​c.601C>T​(p.His201Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000319 in 1,613,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC2
ENST00000391945.10 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.87
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC2 (HGNC:3434): (ERCC excision repair 2, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is a mechanism to repair damage to DNA. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and is an integral member of the basal transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex. The gene product has ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity and belongs to the RAD3/XPD subfamily of helicases. Defects in this gene can result in three different disorders, the cancer-prone syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01468423).
BP6
Variant 19-45364541-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-45364541-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 546846.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr19-45364541-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC2NM_000400.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.601C>T p.His201Tyr missense_variant 8/23 ENST00000391945.10 NP_000391.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC2ENST00000391945.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.601C>T p.His201Tyr missense_variant 8/231 NM_000400.4 ENSP00000375809 P1P18074-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000289
AC:
44
AN:
152138
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000541
AC:
135
AN:
249522
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000709
AC XY:
96
AN XY:
135390
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000302
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000986
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000323
AC:
472
AN:
1460882
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.000424
AC XY:
308
AN XY:
726722
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00335
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000282
AC:
43
AN:
152256
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000255
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000244
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000174
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000634
AC:
77
EpiCase
AF:
0.000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Xeroderma pigmentosum Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 28, 2020- -
ERCC2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 06, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Benign
0.45
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.19
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.065
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.97
D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.040
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.84
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.84
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N;.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.60
MVP
0.78
MPC
0.25
ClinPred
0.15
T
GERP RS
4.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7
Varity_R
0.23
gMVP
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799792; hg19: chr19-45867799; API