rs199891090
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000784.4(CYP27A1):c.-6C>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000391 in 1,535,340 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000784.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cerebrotendinous xanthomatosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000784.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP27A1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-6C>A | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 9 | ENSP00000258415.4 | Q02318 | |||
| CYP27A1 | c.-6C>A | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 9 | ENSP00000571611.1 | |||||
| CYP27A1 | c.-6C>A | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 9 | ENSP00000571612.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000227 AC: 3AN: 132192 AF XY: 0.0000277 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000289 AC: 4AN: 1383110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000146 AC XY: 1AN XY: 682658 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at