rs201342438

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):ā€‹c.2878T>Cā€‹(p.Trp960Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00365 in 1,591,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0025 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0038 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 missense

Scores

7
7
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:6B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.048254102).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00254 (386/152096) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.004 (272/67994). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00361. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 172 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CEP152NM_001194998.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2878T>C p.Trp960Arg missense_variant 20/27 ENST00000380950.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CEP152ENST00000380950.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2878T>C p.Trp960Arg missense_variant 20/271 NM_001194998.2 A2O94986-4
CEP152ENST00000399334.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2878T>C p.Trp960Arg missense_variant 20/261 P2O94986-3
CEP152ENST00000325747.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.2599T>C p.Trp867Arg missense_variant 19/251 A2O94986-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00255
AC:
387
AN:
151978
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000605
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00354
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000756
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00401
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00253
AC:
591
AN:
233654
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00251
AC XY:
317
AN XY:
126338
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000394
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00264
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00628
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000607
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000867
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00369
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00377
AC:
5427
AN:
1439640
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00368
AC XY:
2629
AN XY:
713762
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000652
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00276
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00594
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000910
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00376
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00254
AC:
386
AN:
152096
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00231
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
74340
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000756
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00400
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00376
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00271
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00324
AC:
12
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00519
AC:
20
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00109
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00427
AC:
35
ExAC
AF:
0.00243
AC:
294
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:6Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 13, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 27, 2023Variant previously reported in the heterozygous state in three unrelated individuals with atrioventricular septal defects; however, these individuals did not have features of CEP125-related disorders and did not have a second variant identified in CEP152 (D'Alessandro et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25996639, 31696992, 34402213) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024CEP152: BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 15, 2013- -
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moleculaire, Universite Libre de Bruxelles-- -
Seckel syndrome 5;C3553886:Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
CEP152-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 19, 2021This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.99
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.18
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.030
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.76
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.73
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.090
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.048
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.17
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.67
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-8.6
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.41
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0010
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;D
Vest4
0.87
MutPred
0.44
Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0171);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0171);.;
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.51
ClinPred
0.074
T
GERP RS
5.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.94
gMVP
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201342438; hg19: chr15-49048567; COSMIC: COSV57860954; API