rs2255543
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000187.4(HGD):c.240A>T(p.Gln80His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.741 in 1,607,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 442,525 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000187.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.751 AC: 114080AN: 151944Hom.: 42926 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.741 AC: 186129AN: 251302Hom.: 69378 AF XY: 0.737 AC XY: 100043AN XY: 135808
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.740 AC: 1076532AN: 1455208Hom.: 399546 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.738 AC XY: 534834AN XY: 724356
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.751 AC: 114195AN: 152062Hom.: 42979 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.749 AC XY: 55650AN XY: 74330
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Alkaptonuria Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at