rs2631365

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):​c.285T>C​(p.Leu95Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.405 in 1,582,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 135,090 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L95L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.41 ( 13132 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.40 ( 121958 hom. )

Consequence

SLC22A5
NM_003060.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.298

Publications

28 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC22A5 (HGNC:10969): (solute carrier family 22 member 5) Polyspecific organic cation transporters in the liver, kidney, intestine, and other organs are critical for elimination of many endogenous small organic cations as well as a wide array of drugs and environmental toxins. The encoded protein is a plasma integral membrane protein which functions both as an organic cation transporter and as a sodium-dependent high affinity carnitine transporter. The encoded protein is involved in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. Mutations in this gene are the cause of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP), an autosomal recessive disorder manifested early in life by hypoketotic hypoglycemia and acute metabolic decompensation, and later in life by skeletal myopathy or cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
MIR3936HG (HGNC:40538): (MIR3936 host gene)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 5-132370257-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132370257-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 94099.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.298 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.65 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC22A5NM_003060.4 linkc.285T>C p.Leu95Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 10 ENST00000245407.8 NP_003051.1 O76082-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC22A5ENST00000245407.8 linkc.285T>C p.Leu95Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 10 1 NM_003060.4 ENSP00000245407.3 O76082-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.407
AC:
61787
AN:
151952
Hom.:
13124
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.359
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.237
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.352
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.416
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.668
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.641
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.512
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.490
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.392
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.433
AC:
82365
AN:
190330
AF XY:
0.445
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.341
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.313
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.397
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.506
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.378
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.417
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.405
AC:
579057
AN:
1430510
Hom.:
121958
Cov.:
58
AF XY:
0.412
AC XY:
292033
AN XY:
708786
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.353
AC:
11583
AN:
32772
American (AMR)
AF:
0.324
AC:
12792
AN:
39448
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.400
AC:
10270
AN:
25682
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.668
AC:
25247
AN:
37786
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.620
AC:
51246
AN:
82710
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.505
AC:
25053
AN:
49598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.471
AC:
2689
AN:
5712
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.379
AC:
415559
AN:
1097512
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.415
AC:
24618
AN:
59290
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.460
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20206
40411
60617
80822
101028
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13238
26476
39714
52952
66190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.407
AC:
61825
AN:
152070
Hom.:
13132
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.417
AC XY:
31020
AN XY:
74334
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.359
AC:
14913
AN:
41514
American (AMR)
AF:
0.352
AC:
5389
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.416
AC:
1444
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.668
AC:
3440
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.642
AC:
3092
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.512
AC:
5419
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.473
AC:
138
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.397
AC:
26945
AN:
67924
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.392
AC:
829
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1894
3787
5681
7574
9468
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
592
1184
1776
2368
2960
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.366
Hom.:
4306
Bravo
AF:
0.386

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal carnitine transport defect Benign:7
Aug 01, 2017
Phosphorus, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 15, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 07, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The variant was observed in the general population by the ExAC project at an allele frequency of ~50% across diverse ethnicities including numerous homozygotes indicating the variant to be a neutral polymorphism. Therefore the variant is classified as Benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
9.6
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
-0.30
PromoterAI
0.0037
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2631365; hg19: chr5-131705949; COSMIC: COSV55371662; COSMIC: COSV55371662; API