rs33927012

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_003000.3(SDHB):​c.487T>C​(p.Ser163Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0131 in 1,613,448 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 207 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0095 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 193 hom. )

Consequence

SDHB
NM_003000.3 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:24O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHB (HGNC:10681): (succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B) This tumor suppressor gene encodes the iron-sulfur protein subunit of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex which plays a critical role in mitochondria. The SDH enzyme complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits. This enzyme complex converts succinate to fumarate which releases electrons as part of the citric acid cycle, and the enzyme complex additionally provides an attachment site for released electrons to be transferred to the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. The SDH enzyme complex plays a role in oxygen-related gene regulation through its conversion of succinate, which is an oxygen sensor that stabilizes the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) transcription factor. Sporadic and familial mutations in this gene result in paragangliomas, pheochromocytoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, supporting a link between mitochondrial dysfunction and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene are also implicated in nuclear type 4 mitochondrial complex II deficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a region_of_interest Interaction with SDHAF1 (size 72) in uniprot entity SDHB_HUMAN there are 30 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (97%) in NM_003000.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008068502).
BP6
Variant 1-17027802-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-17027802-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 12792.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, not_provided=1, Benign=16, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr1-17027802-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00947 (1441/152204) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0193 (93/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 717 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 Mitochondrial gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SDHBNM_003000.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.487T>C p.Ser163Pro missense_variant 5/8 ENST00000375499.8 NP_002991.2
SDHBNM_001407361.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.433T>C p.Ser145Pro missense_variant 5/8 NP_001394290.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHBENST00000375499.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.487T>C p.Ser163Pro missense_variant 5/81 NM_003000.3 ENSP00000364649 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00947
AC:
1441
AN:
152086
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00465
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00909
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0121
AC:
3045
AN:
251388
Hom.:
33
AF XY:
0.0130
AC XY:
1760
AN XY:
135866
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00393
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00655
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0216
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0135
AC:
19718
AN:
1461244
Hom.:
193
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.0137
AC XY:
9927
AN XY:
726966
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00362
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0111
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00947
AC:
1441
AN:
152204
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00963
AC XY:
717
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00465
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00852
Alfa
AF:
0.0128
Hom.:
23
Bravo
AF:
0.00751
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0183
AC:
68
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0125
AC:
48
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00272
AC:
12
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0130
AC:
112
ExAC
AF:
0.0125
AC:
1523
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00866
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0136
EpiControl
AF:
0.0149

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:24Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 03, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 03, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 16, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 08, 2017Variant summary: The SDHB c.487T>C (p.Ser163Pro) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 1523/121404 control chromosomes (21 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0125449, which largely exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SDHB variant (0.0000009), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Paragangliomas 4 Uncertain:2Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 23, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, IncNov 01, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEquipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de BourgogneNov 21, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 24, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 09, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaFeb 13, 2015- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024SDHB: BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 10, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19215943, 16322339, 17298551, 16912137, 22995991, 19768395, 22584711, 19802898, 19399650, 22293219, 24735130, 20981092, 27153395, 18678321, 21979946, 25376524, 22938532, 22703879, 25694510, 23666964, 25333069, 24728327, 26071763, 17102082, 17102083, 22270996, 25695889, 17639058, 14985401, 26182300, 18419787, 19153209, 19522823, 19454582, 27279923, 27884173, 26092435, 28374168, 29386252, 30050099, 31019283) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 11, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 23, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cowden syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMAug 01, 2008- -
Pheochromocytoma;C0238198:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor;C1861848:Paragangliomas 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCenter of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care-- -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Carney-Stratakis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.085
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.12
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.86
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.23
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.029
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.81
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0081
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.12
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.47
N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.44
N;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.44
Sift
Benign
0.77
T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.
Vest4
0.12
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
0.025
T
GERP RS
5.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs33927012; hg19: chr1-17354297; COSMIC: COSV64965186; COSMIC: COSV64965186; API