rs33927012
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_003000.3(SDHB):c.487T>C(p.Ser163Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0131 in 1,613,448 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 207 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0095 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 193 hom. )
Consequence
SDHB
NM_003000.3 missense
NM_003000.3 missense
Scores
5
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.71
Genes affected
SDHB (HGNC:10681): (succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B) This tumor suppressor gene encodes the iron-sulfur protein subunit of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex which plays a critical role in mitochondria. The SDH enzyme complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits. This enzyme complex converts succinate to fumarate which releases electrons as part of the citric acid cycle, and the enzyme complex additionally provides an attachment site for released electrons to be transferred to the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. The SDH enzyme complex plays a role in oxygen-related gene regulation through its conversion of succinate, which is an oxygen sensor that stabilizes the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) transcription factor. Sporadic and familial mutations in this gene result in paragangliomas, pheochromocytoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, supporting a link between mitochondrial dysfunction and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene are also implicated in nuclear type 4 mitochondrial complex II deficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM1
In a region_of_interest Interaction with SDHAF1 (size 72) in uniprot entity SDHB_HUMAN there are 30 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (97%) in NM_003000.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008068502).
BP6
Variant 1-17027802-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-17027802-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 12792.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, not_provided=1, Benign=16, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr1-17027802-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00947 (1441/152204) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0193 (93/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 717 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 Mitochondrial gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHB | NM_003000.3 | c.487T>C | p.Ser163Pro | missense_variant | 5/8 | ENST00000375499.8 | NP_002991.2 | |
SDHB | NM_001407361.1 | c.433T>C | p.Ser145Pro | missense_variant | 5/8 | NP_001394290.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHB | ENST00000375499.8 | c.487T>C | p.Ser163Pro | missense_variant | 5/8 | 1 | NM_003000.3 | ENSP00000364649 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00947 AC: 1441AN: 152086Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1441
AN:
152086
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0121 AC: 3045AN: 251388Hom.: 33 AF XY: 0.0130 AC XY: 1760AN XY: 135866
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3045
AN:
251388
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1760
AN XY:
135866
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0135 AC: 19718AN: 1461244Hom.: 193 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0137 AC XY: 9927AN XY: 726966
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
19718
AN:
1461244
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
9927
AN XY:
726966
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00947 AC: 1441AN: 152204Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00963 AC XY: 717AN XY: 74424
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1441
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
717
AN XY:
74424
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
68
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
48
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
12
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
112
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1523
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:24Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:10Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 03, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 03, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 16, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 08, 2017 | Variant summary: The SDHB c.487T>C (p.Ser163Pro) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 1523/121404 control chromosomes (21 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0125449, which largely exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SDHB variant (0.0000009), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Paragangliomas 4 Uncertain:2Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 23, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Equipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de Bourgogne | Nov 21, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 24, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 09, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Feb 13, 2015 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | SDHB: BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 10, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19215943, 16322339, 17298551, 16912137, 22995991, 19768395, 22584711, 19802898, 19399650, 22293219, 24735130, 20981092, 27153395, 18678321, 21979946, 25376524, 22938532, 22703879, 25694510, 23666964, 25333069, 24728327, 26071763, 17102082, 17102083, 22270996, 25695889, 17639058, 14985401, 26182300, 18419787, 19153209, 19522823, 19454582, 27279923, 27884173, 26092435, 28374168, 29386252, 30050099, 31019283) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 11, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 23, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Cowden syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Aug 01, 2008 | - - |
Pheochromocytoma;C0238198:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor;C1861848:Paragangliomas 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care | - | - - |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Carney-Stratakis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T
Polyphen
B;.;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at