rs371929703
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.13213C>T(p.Arg4405Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000162 in 1,613,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R4405H) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001277115.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001277115.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH11 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.13213C>T | p.Arg4405Cys | missense | Exon 81 of 82 | ENSP00000475939.1 | Q96DT5 | ||
| CDCA7L | c.*2292G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000574800.1 | |||||
| DNAH11 | TSL:3 | n.584C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000124 AC: 31AN: 249092 AF XY: 0.000111 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000157 AC: 229AN: 1461650Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000144 AC XY: 105AN XY: 727112 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000229 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74316 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at