rs546463058
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.2052G>A(p.Pro684Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000581 in 1,600,714 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000152.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000933 AC: 21AN: 225086Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000115 AC XY: 14AN XY: 122242
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000483 AC: 70AN: 1448360Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000500 AC XY: 36AN XY: 719584
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:4
- -
The c.2052G>A (p.Pro684=) variant in GAA has not been previously reported in individuals with Glycogen Storage Disease II but has been reported as a VUS by EGL Genetic Diagnostics and a likely benign variant by Invitae and GeneDx in ClinVar (Variation ID: 387758). This variant has been identified in 0.015% (5/33352) of Latino chromosomes and 0.013% (3/22566) of African chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs546463058). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is low enough to be consistent with a recessive carrier frequency. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. However, novel synonymous variants supported by computational evidence without raised suspicion for an impact are likely benign (Richards 2015). In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2, BP4, BP7 (Richards 2015). -
- -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
- -
GAA: BP4, BP7 -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at