rs62636287

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 4P and 20B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_201253.3(CRB1):c.2306G>A(p.Arg769His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00261 in 1,613,914 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 107 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R769C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 100 hom. )

Consequence

CRB1
NM_201253.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.247

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRB1 (HGNC:2343): (crumbs cell polarity complex component 1) This gene encodes a protein which is similar to the Drosophila crumbs protein and localizes to the inner segment of mammalian photoreceptors. In Drosophila crumbs localizes to the stalk of the fly photoreceptor and may be a component of the molecular scaffold that controls proper development of polarity in the eye. Mutations in this gene are associated with a severe form of retinitis pigmentosa, RP12, and with Leber congenital amaurosis. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants, some protein coding and some non-protein coding.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

CRB1 links:

CRB1 (HGNC:):

CRB1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 10 uncertain in NM_201253.3

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr1-197427630-CGC-CAG is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0066185296).

BP6

Variant 1-197427631-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-197427631-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 99878.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-197427631-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0516 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRB1	NM_201253.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.2306G>A	p.Arg769His	missense_variant	7/12	ENST00000367400.8	NP_957705.1	P82279-1A0A7D6VM04

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRB1	ENST00000367400.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.2306G>A	p.Arg769His	missense_variant	7/12	1	NM_201253.3	ENSP00000356370.3		P82279-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00279

AC:

424

AN:

152100

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0564

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000691

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00449

AC:

1126

AN:

250768

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00407

AC XY:

551

AN XY:

135546

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000199

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0505

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00167

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000644

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00328

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00259

AC:

3788

AN:

1461696

Hom.:

100

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00256

AC XY:

1860

AN XY:

727144

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0693

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00190

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000493

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00291

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00280

AC:

426

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00309

AC XY:

230

AN XY:

74418

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00393

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0569

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000691

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00268

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00303

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00446

AC:

541

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0190

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2Other:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
not provided, no classification provided	literature only	Retina International	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 03, 2015	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Mar 19, 2014	- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 8

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Apr 11, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Pigmented paravenous retinochoroidal atrophy

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Apr 11, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Natera, Inc.

Sep 16, 2020

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 12;C3151202:Leber congenital amaurosis 8

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Feb 01, 2024

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 12

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome-Nilou Lab

Apr 11, 2023

- -

Retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Oct 01, 2023

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.060

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

0.52

DANN

Benign

0.13

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.13

T;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.4

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.015

LIST_S2

Benign

0.14

T;.;T;T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0066

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

-2.4

.;N;N;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.21

PROVEAN

Benign

1.8

N;.;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.14

Sift

Benign

0.66

T;.;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.43

T;.;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;.;B;B;.

Vest4

0.17

MVP

0.54

MPC

0.034

ClinPred

0.0087

GERP RS

0.56

Varity_R

0.027

gMVP

0.47

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over