rs71579841

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP6BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.119C>T(p.Ala40Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000285 in 1,611,538 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.54

Variant links:

Genes affected

BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

BARD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.38985988).

BP6

Variant 2-214809451-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214809451-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142910.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=8}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BARD1	NM_000465.4 link	c.119C>T	p.Ala40Val	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 11	ENST00000260947.9	NP_000456.2	Q99728-1A0AVN2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BARD1	ENST00000260947.9 link	c.119C>T	p.Ala40Val	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 11	1	NM_000465.4	ENSP00000260947.4		Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000864

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000292

AC:

AN:

239990

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000531

AC XY:

AN XY:

131938

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000878

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000102

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000280

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

AN:

1459338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000275

AC XY:

AN XY:

726038

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000422

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000990

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000116

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74352

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000864

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000691

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000567

ExAC

AF:

0.0000416

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Jul 18, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -

Mar 17, 2024

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 40 of the BARD1 protein (p.Ala40Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs71579841, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or gastric cancer (PMID: 28202063, 30680046, 32658311). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142910). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BARD1 function (PMID: 26350354). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Aug 22, 2023

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BARD1 c.119C>T (p.Ala40Val) missense change has a maximum non-founder subpopulation frequency of 0.011% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and a functional assay measuring homology-directed repair (HDR) activity indicates that this variant showed function similar to the wild-type (PMID: 26350354). This variant has been reported in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast cancer (PMID: 28202063, 32658311). It has also been reported in one individual in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database, https://whi.color.com/). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:3

Oct 11, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Published functional studies demonstrate homology-directed repair activity comparable to wild-type (PMID: 26350354); Observed in individuals with breast and other cancers, as well as in unaffected controls (PMID: 30680046, 28202063, 28873162, 31036035); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 11573085, 23056176, 28202063, 26315354, 28873162, 30680046, 30613976, 18480049, 31036035, 26350354) -

Jul 21, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 28202063 (2017), 30613976 (2019), 32658311 (2021)), and gastric cancer (PMID: 30680046 (2019)). This variant has also been reported in unaffected individual (PMID: 26315354 (2015)). A homology-directed repair functional assay indicates that this variant is functional (PMID: 26350354 (2015)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00011 (4/35032 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

May 12, 2022

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 28, 2023

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces alanine with valine at codon 40 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has shown that this variant does not impact homology-directed DNA repair in a cell line-based assay (PMID: 26350354). This variant has been reported in two individuals affected with breast cancer and one individual affected with gastric cancer (PMID: 28202063, 30680046, 30613976) and also in an unaffected individual from an ovarian cancer case-control study (PMID: 26315354). This variant has been identified in 10/271360 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Dec 09, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Oct 29, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BARD1 c.119C>T (p.Ala40Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.2e-05 in 246852 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.119C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer or gastric cancer (Jalkh_2017, Henn_2019, Rizzolo_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function in vitro (Lee_2015). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.67

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.010

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.030

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.13

T;.;.;.;T;.;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.38

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.30

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.81

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

D;D;D;D;D;D;.

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.86

MetaRNN

Benign

0.39

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.46

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

L;.;L;.;.;L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.73

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.1

N;.;.;.;.;.;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.45

Sift

Uncertain

0.0040

D;.;.;.;.;.;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;T;D;T;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.50

MVP

0.98

MPC

0.43

ClinPred

0.48

GERP RS

3.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.66

gMVP

0.56

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over