rs72550820
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000222.3(KIT):c.67+4G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0138 in 1,613,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 196 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000222.3 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- gastrointestinal stromal tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- piebaldismInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- cutaneous mastocytosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- mastocytosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIT | NM_000222.3 | c.67+4G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 20 | ENST00000288135.6 | NP_000213.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIT | ENST00000288135.6 | c.67+4G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 20 | 1 | NM_000222.3 | ENSP00000288135.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0102 AC: 1546AN: 152174Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0115 AC: 2882AN: 249620 AF XY: 0.0123 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0141 AC: 20655AN: 1461464Hom.: 187 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0144 AC XY: 10438AN XY: 727070 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0101 AC: 1543AN: 152292Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0106 AC XY: 790AN XY: 74464 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23020152, 27535533, 7529964, 15901127, 22264755) -
KIT: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Piebaldism Benign:2
The heterozygous c.67+4G>A variant in KIT has been reported in an individual with piebaldism (PMID: 7529964) but has also been reported in >2% of South Asian chromosomes and 15 homozygotes by ExAC (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal dominant piebaldism. -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:2
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
- -
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at