Menu
GeneBe

rs72550822

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000222.3(KIT):​c.1588G>A​(p.Val530Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000986 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V530L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00097 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

KIT
NM_000222.3 missense

Scores

3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.21
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIT (HGNC:6342): (KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase. This gene was initially identified as a homolog of the feline sarcoma viral oncogene v-kit and is often referred to as proto-oncogene c-Kit. The canonical form of this glycosylated transmembrane protein has an N-terminal extracellular region with five immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain at the C-terminus. Upon activation by its cytokine ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), this protein phosphorylates multiple intracellular proteins that play a role in in the proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis of many cell types and thereby plays an important role in hematopoiesis, stem cell maintenance, gametogenesis, melanogenesis, and in mast cell development, migration and function. This protein can be a membrane-bound or soluble protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mast cell disease, acute myelogenous leukemia, and piebaldism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, KIT
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.017944992).
BP6
Variant 4-54727265-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54727265-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134621.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, not_provided=1, Likely_benign=6, Benign=1}. Variant chr4-54727265-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 179 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KITNM_000222.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1588G>A p.Val530Ile missense_variant 10/21 ENST00000288135.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KITENST00000288135.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1588G>A p.Val530Ile missense_variant 10/211 NM_000222.3 P4P10721-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
177
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000549
AC:
138
AN:
251244
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000567
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
135776
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000837
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000967
AC:
1413
AN:
1461832
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000936
AC XY:
681
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000537
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00104
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00118
AC:
179
AN:
152312
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00126
AC XY:
94
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00110
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00118
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00227
AC:
10
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000552
AC:
67
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00104
EpiControl
AF:
0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJun 08, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The KIT p.Val526Ile variant has been reported in patients with acute and chronic myeloid leukemia and in an aggressive fibromatosis tumor (Kurtz_2010_PMID:20339585; Kirschner_2015_PMID:25894969; Gari_1999_PMID:10554798; Beghini_2004_PMID:15339674). Functional analysis suggests that this variant may lead to higher sensitivity to Imatinib (Commenga_2013_PMID:16081693). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs72550822), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae), and LOVD 3.0, but was not identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in control databases in 148 of 268108 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.000552 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 35 of 23608 chromosomes (freq: 0.001483), European (non-Finnish) in 89 of 117972 chromosomes (freq: 0.000754), Latino in 20 of 35100 chromosomes (freq: 0.00057), Other in 3 of 6692 chromosomes (freq: 0.000448) and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 9858 chromosomes (freq: 0.000101), but was not observed in the East Asian, European (Finnish), or South Asian populations. The p.Val526 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 29, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 27, 2021- -
Piebaldism Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Mastocytosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
KIT-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 15, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.080
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.75
Eigen
Benign
-0.27
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.039
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.31
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.30
Sift
Benign
0.39
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.76
T;T
Polyphen
0.45
P;B
Vest4
0.075
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.045
gMVP
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72550822; hg19: chr4-55593431; COSMIC: COSV55396593; COSMIC: COSV55396593; API