rs74060854
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000361547.7(SELENON):c.1745G>A(p.Arg582Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00426 in 1,614,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 246 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R582W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000361547.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELENON | NM_020451.3 | c.1745G>A | p.Arg582Gln | missense_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000361547.7 | NP_065184.2 | |
SELENON | NM_206926.2 | c.1643G>A | p.Arg548Gln | missense_variant | 12/12 | NP_996809.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELENON | ENST00000361547.7 | c.1745G>A | p.Arg582Gln | missense_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_020451.3 | ENSP00000355141 | ||
SELENON | ENST00000374315.1 | c.1643G>A | p.Arg548Gln | missense_variant | 12/12 | 5 | ENSP00000363434 | P1 | ||
SELENON | ENST00000354177.9 | c.1574G>A | p.Arg525Gln | missense_variant | 12/12 | 5 | ENSP00000346109 | |||
SELENON | ENST00000494537.2 | c.*265G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 13/13 | 3 | ENSP00000508308 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0219 AC: 3325AN: 152158Hom.: 131 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00567 AC: 1413AN: 249410Hom.: 68 AF XY: 0.00404 AC XY: 547AN XY: 135338
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00242 AC: 3534AN: 1461782Hom.: 115 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00207 AC XY: 1505AN XY: 727200
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0219 AC: 3342AN: 152276Hom.: 131 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0211 AC XY: 1569AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 26, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
SEPN1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Eichsfeld type congenital muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at