rs766908700

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PP3_ModerateBS2

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.761G>A(p.Arg254His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000124 in 1,613,914 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R254C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BMPR1A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
juvenile polyposis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
congenital heart defects, multiple types
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
pulmonary arterial hypertension
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

BMPR1A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.918

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 18 AD,Unknown gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004329.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
BMPR1A	NM_004329.3	MANE Select	c.761G>A	p.Arg254His	missense	Exon 9 of 13	NP_004320.2
BMPR1A	NM_001406559.1		c.836G>A	p.Arg279His	missense	Exon 10 of 14	NP_001393488.1
BMPR1A	NM_001406560.1		c.809G>A	p.Arg270His	missense	Exon 10 of 14	NP_001393489.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
BMPR1A	ENST00000372037.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.761G>A	p.Arg254His	missense	Exon 9 of 13	ENSP00000361107.2
BMPR1A	ENST00000926286.1		c.809G>A	p.Arg270His	missense	Exon 10 of 14	ENSP00000596345.1
BMPR1A	ENST00000480152.3	TSL:3	c.761G>A	p.Arg254His	missense	Exon 10 of 14	ENSP00000483569.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000159

AC:

AN:

251344

AF XY:

0.00000736

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000123

AC:

AN:

1461768

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000151

AC XY:

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000135

AC:

AN:

1111926

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.453

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74334

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41430

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15268

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

314

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2092

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.0296732), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.400

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000868

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (2)

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (2)

not provided (2)

not specified (1)

Polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2 (1)

Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.79

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.28

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.36

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.75

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.81

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.14

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.92

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.73

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.3

PhyloP100

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.79

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.6

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.81

Sift

Benign

0.054

Sift4G

Benign

0.096

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.93

MutPred

0.75

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0219)

MVP

0.97

MPC

3.0

ClinPred

0.89

GERP RS

5.6

Varity_R

0.46

gMVP

0.64

Mutation Taster

=18/82

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over