rs766938558

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001354604.2(MITF):c.881-9C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,611,250 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MITF
NM_001354604.2 intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.009588

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.96

Variant links:

Genes affected

MITF (HGNC:7105): (melanocyte inducing transcription factor) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor that contains both basic helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper structural features. The encoded protein regulates melanocyte development and is responsible for pigment cell-specific transcription of the melanogenesis enzyme genes. Heterozygous mutations in the this gene cause auditory-pigmentary syndromes, such as Waardenburg syndrome type 2 and Tietz syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

MITF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.21).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00011 (160/1459090) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000136 (151/1109760). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000118. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 81 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MITF	NM_001354604.2 link	c.881-9C>G		intron_variant	Intron 6 of 9	ENST00000352241.9	NP_001341533.1
MITF	NM_000248.4 link	c.560-9C>G		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 8	ENST00000394351.9	NP_000239.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MITF	ENST00000352241.9 link	c.881-9C>G		intron_variant	Intron 6 of 9	1	NM_001354604.2	ENSP00000295600.8		O75030-1
MITF	ENST00000394351.9 link	c.560-9C>G		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 8	1	NM_000248.4	ENSP00000377880.3		O75030-9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000599

AC:

AN:

250444

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

135338

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000133

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000110

AC:

160

AN:

1459090

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000112

AC XY:

AN XY:

726030

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000136

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000133

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74328

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000718

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Dec 24, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.560-9C>G variant in MITF has not been previously reported in individuals w ith hearing loss or Waardenburg syndrome, but has been identified in 6/64578 Eur opean chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadin stitute.org). This frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. The variant is located in the 3' splice region, and computational tools suggest an impact to splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to det ermine pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the c.560-9C>G va riant is uncertain. -

Tietz syndrome;C1860339:Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8

Uncertain:1

Dec 28, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change falls in intron 5 of the MITF gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the MITF protein. This variant is present in population databases (rs766938558, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MITF-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 228853). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Tietz syndrome;C1860339:Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8;C4310625:Coloboma, osteopetrosis, microphthalmia, macrocephaly, albinism, and deafness

Uncertain:1

Dec 22, 2023

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jul 13, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.21

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Benign

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0096

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.16

SpliceAI score (max)

0.74

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AG_spliceai

0.74

Position offset: 1

DS_AL_spliceai

0.46

Position offset: 9

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over