rs779634956
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001130823.3(DNMT1):c.803C>T(p.Pro268Leu) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/24 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001130823.3 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, deafness and narcolepsyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNMT1 | NM_001130823.3 | c.803C>T | p.Pro268Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 10 of 41 | ENST00000359526.9 | NP_001124295.1 | |
| DNMT1 | NM_001318730.2 | c.755C>T | p.Pro252Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 9 of 40 | NP_001305659.1 | ||
| DNMT1 | NM_001379.4 | c.755C>T | p.Pro252Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 9 of 40 | NP_001370.1 | ||
| DNMT1 | NM_001318731.2 | c.440C>T | p.Pro147Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 10 of 41 | NP_001305660.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNMT1 | ENST00000359526.9 | c.803C>T | p.Pro268Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 10 of 41 | 1 | NM_001130823.3 | ENSP00000352516.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251446 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 24AN: 1461858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74298 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 268 of the DNMT1 protein (p.Pro268Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs779634956, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with DNMT1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 566392). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The leucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at