rs869320706
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PVS1_ModeratePM2PP3
The NM_000245.4(MET):c.3011_3028+9del variant causes a splice donor, splice donor 5th base, coding sequence, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as risk factor (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
MET
NM_000245.4 splice_donor, splice_donor_5th_base, coding_sequence, intron
NM_000245.4 splice_donor, splice_donor_5th_base, coding_sequence, intron
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.33
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
PVS1
Splicing +-2 bp (donor or acceptor) variant, product NOT destroyed by NMD, known LOF gene, truncates exone, which is 0.033549007 fraction of the gene. No cryptic splice site detected. Exon removal is inframe change.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, but strongly conserved according to phyloP
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | NM_000245.4 | c.3011_3028+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, coding_sequence_variant, intron_variant | 14/21 | ENST00000397752.8 | ||
MET | NM_001127500.3 | c.3065_3082+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, coding_sequence_variant, intron_variant | 14/21 | |||
MET | NM_001324402.2 | c.1721_1738+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, coding_sequence_variant, intron_variant | 13/20 | |||
MET | XM_011516223.2 | c.3068_3085+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, coding_sequence_variant, intron_variant | 15/22 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | ENST00000397752.8 | c.3011_3028+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, coding_sequence_variant, intron_variant | 14/21 | 1 | NM_000245.4 | P3 | ||
MET | ENST00000318493.11 | c.3065_3082+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, coding_sequence_variant, intron_variant | 14/21 | 1 | A2 | |||
MET | ENST00000436117.3 | c.*616_*633+9del | splice_donor_variant, splice_donor_5th_base_variant, 3_prime_UTR_variant, intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 13/20 | 1 | ||||
MET | ENST00000454623.1 | c.283+318_283+344del | intron_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: risk factor
Submissions summary: Other:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Osteofibrous dysplasia Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Aug 23, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at