rs878853654
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_000116.5(TAFAZZIN):c.227C>G(p.Pro76Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000116.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAFAZZIN | NM_000116.5 | c.227C>G | p.Pro76Arg | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 11 | ENST00000601016.6 | NP_000107.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 25
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 25
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
3-Methylglutaconic aciduria type 2 Pathogenic:1
In conclusion, this variant is absent from population databases, is predicted to be deleterious, and was shown to have occurred de novo. For these reasons, this variant has a been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency) and has not been reported in the literature in individuals with a TAZ-related disease. Family studies indicate this missense variant likely was not inherited from either parent (i.e. occurred de novo) in an individual with disease (Invitae database). This sequence change replaces proline with arginine at codon 76 of the TAZ protein (p.Pro76Arg). The proline residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and arginine. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at